In general, I think the 35mm is ideal for busy areas such as in cities, where people move fast and are all together on small sidewalks. The fast-moving scenes necessitate a lens that will minimize mistakes and allow you to get close and capture multiple subjects altogether. The 50mm lens on the other hand is ideal for quieter areas such as in \$\begingroup\$ This is a total misunderstanding of the entire 50mm=human eye rule of thumb. It came from the fact that in the film days a 50mm lens on a 35mm film camera often yielded the same magnification through the viewfinder with one eye as the the other eye saw looking at the scene directly. Which focal length should you get for street photography - 28mm, 35mm or 50mm? Is the 50mm classic for a reason? Is the 28mm too wide? Or is the 35mm the per A 50mm also adds less wide-angle distortion to your main subject than the 35mm lens. An 85mm prime lens has a more narrow-angle of view than the 35mm and 50mm lenses and is known as the best portrait lens because it adds little, if any, facial distortion to your main subject. The 50mm perspective is more flattering. Portraiture is all about capturing the essence and beauty of the human face, and when it comes to portrait performance, the 50mm lens tends to be far more impressive than the 24mm lens. You see, the longer focal length of the 50mm lens allows you to capture beautiful full-body shots – and even My 35mm summicron has replaced my 50 lux as my daily driver. I still adore the 50mm focal length but 35 is more suited to my needs. There is one technical aspect I guess, which is that you reach the hyperfocal distance quickly with a 28mm. I guess that if you have it at 5.6, pretty much everything is in focus. pbNftnh.

lensa 35mm vs 50mm